Star Trek tells the story of the first voyage of the USS Enterprise seen in The Original Series, and how its crew was first assembled. It focuses on the relationship between Kirk and Spock, how their chalk-and-cheese personalities can be reconciled in order to battle a Romulan threat to Vulcan, Earth and all Federation planets.
The film has been a remarkable success. The online fandom has increased hugely, with LiveJournal in particular flaring up with women who have become Trekkies because they were turned on by the new, young cast and want to write homoerotic fanfiction. The box office takings outstripped anything the old movies managed to generate, and finally, utterly bizarrely, Star Trek has become, almost paradoxically quite cool.
With all this going for it, I thought I would love it. And much of it was pure pleasure. Kirk was more likeable when hes too young and inexperienced to be that smug. Spock, although I did keep thinking of Sylar from Heroes, really couldnt have been better-cast, and the quirky role was realised excellently. Chekhov was just hilarious, the right sort of believable comedy, and Sulu and Scotty worked fine in their roles. I was a little unsure about Uhura, who I felt needed a bit more of the originals somewhat stiff dignity, although the scene in the elevator made sense to me: I loved how it seemed she was offering comfort, when really the one she was comforting was herself. Bones was well-cast and obviously studied DeForest Kellys mannerisms closely, but that was the trouble: it was obvious.
But I didnt love it. I liked it. I enjoyed it, and would recommend it. But I wouldnt watch it again in the cinema. The problem was that there were just too many coincidences, too many shortcuts and pieces of lazy writing. So the exact person Kirk needs to meet just happens to be hanging out in an icy cave at just the right time? They happen to bump into each other not just on the same country, or even planet, but sector of the universe? And this character not only provides exposition but also compels to action and forces character development by providing a model to live up to? The time travel and sidestepping of totally accurate continuity by doing a reboot, that I dont mind so much, but making just that become your thin, circular story?
Okay, its better than saving whales, but its no Wrath of Khan.
Devious Comments
I'm not a massive trek fan, but yeah, I know enough about it to get the references.
What annoys me about this film though is that it's outside the continuity of the franchise. In other words pretty much every single star trek movie and series episode is meant to be part of the same universe and events are linked together, but this is like a "what if" story which makes it all separate and seem kind of pointless.
Previous PageNext Page